Here’s a sample question:
When Paul Martin voted in favour of the following motion in Parliament, "That, in the opinion of this House, it is necessary, in light of the public debate about recent court decisions, to state that marriage is and should remain the union of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others, and that Parliament will take all necessary steps to preserve this definition of marriage in Canada," did he mean that:As Goldstein says, "Don't worry...there are no wrong answers."
(a) Marriage is the union of one man and one woman?
(b) Marriage is the union of one man and one woman, unless I have my fingers crossed?
(c) "Marriage" is such a vague term?
(d) What motion?
h/t: Bourque Newswatch